{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/psychoses","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:29:14.951Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Psychoses","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":1094,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":25.7,"denied_pct":19,"remanded_pct":54.4,"granted_on_merits_pct":57.5,"by_year":[{"year":2019,"issues":77,"granted_pct":14.3,"denied_pct":20.8,"remanded_pct":57.1},{"year":2020,"issues":134,"granted_pct":18.7,"denied_pct":17.9,"remanded_pct":61.9},{"year":2021,"issues":136,"granted_pct":22.1,"denied_pct":14,"remanded_pct":58.8},{"year":2022,"issues":156,"granted_pct":26.9,"denied_pct":17.3,"remanded_pct":52.6},{"year":2023,"issues":212,"granted_pct":27.8,"denied_pct":20.3,"remanded_pct":51.9},{"year":2024,"issues":190,"granted_pct":22.1,"denied_pct":19.5,"remanded_pct":54.2},{"year":2025,"issues":149,"granted_pct":32.9,"denied_pct":22.1,"remanded_pct":41.6},{"year":2026,"issues":81,"granted_pct":32.1,"denied_pct":19.8,"remanded_pct":46.9}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":77.2,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":122,"granted_pct_with":84,"granted_pct_without":51.1},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":746,"granted_pct_with":53.6,"granted_pct_without":74.4},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":187,"granted_pct_with":86.2,"granted_pct_without":47.1},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":436,"granted_pct_with":50.2,"granted_pct_without":62.9},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":353,"granted_pct_with":62.1,"granted_pct_without":54.5},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":85,"granted_pct_with":67.9,"granted_pct_without":56.2},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":910,"granted_pct_with":55.8,"granted_pct_without":76.9},{"evidence":"buddy_statement","decisions_with":47,"granted_pct_with":66.7,"granted_pct_without":57.2},{"evidence":"combat_service","decisions_with":72,"granted_pct_with":75,"granted_pct_without":56.1}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":15},{"reason":"symptoms approximate total occupational and social impairment","decisions":4},{"reason":"symptoms approximated total occupational and social impairment","decisions":4},{"reason":"deficiencies in most areas of occupational and social functioning","decisions":4},{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":4},{"reason":"continuity of symptomatology since service","decisions":3}],"denied":[{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":21},{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":12},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":11},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":10},{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":6},{"reason":"symptoms did not meet criteria for 100% rating","decisions":5}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"26004982","year":2026,"judge":"KRISTI L. GUNN","rationale":"Benefit of the doubt afforded to appellant.; Evidence in approximate balance.; Preexisting psychiatric disorder aggravated beyond natural progression by service."},{"case_id":"A26038783","year":2026,"judge":"D. MARTZ AMES","rationale":"Current psychiatric disability found by AOJ.; Veteran's testimony regarding traumatic service events found credible and competent.; Private medical opinion persuasively linked disorder to service, explaining lack of service records.; VA opinion given little weight due to reliance on lack of document… [truncated, 12 chars omitted]"},{"case_id":"A26038473","year":2026,"judge":"MARCUS N. FULTON","rationale":"Symptoms of disturbed motivation and mood; Difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships; Resolved reasonable doubt in favor of the veteran"}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26037317","year":2026,"judge":"L. STEPANICK","rationale":"Evidence did not demonstrate total occupational and social impairment.; Symptoms did not rise to the level required for 100% rating.; Impairment most closely approximated 70% rating criteria."},{"case_id":"A26036126","year":2026,"judge":"JONATHAN B. KRAMER","rationale":"No PTSD diagnosis; other specified trauma and stressor related disorder not related to service.; Private opinion deemed inadequate due to conclusory reasoning and internal inconsistencies.; Veteran's claims of psychiatric treatment during service and incarceration found not credible due to inconsist… [truncated, 20 chars omitted]"},{"case_id":"26004579","year":2026,"judge":"ANN K. MINAMI","rationale":"Evidence did not support total occupational and social impairment prior to July 1, 2017.; Veteran maintained some social relationships and had normal thought processes/judgement per VA exam.; Evidence did not support total occupational and social impairment from December 11, 2019."}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}