{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/peripheral-vestibular-disorders","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:34:08.295Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Peripheral vestibular disorders","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":4924,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":19.2,"denied_pct":27.3,"remanded_pct":52,"granted_on_merits_pct":41.3,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":344,"granted_pct":12.5,"denied_pct":36.3,"remanded_pct":44.8},{"year":2018,"issues":498,"granted_pct":13.3,"denied_pct":32.5,"remanded_pct":51.2},{"year":2019,"issues":556,"granted_pct":13.3,"denied_pct":28.1,"remanded_pct":55.9},{"year":2020,"issues":482,"granted_pct":16.6,"denied_pct":30.7,"remanded_pct":51.2},{"year":2021,"issues":519,"granted_pct":15.2,"denied_pct":24.9,"remanded_pct":59},{"year":2022,"issues":526,"granted_pct":16.7,"denied_pct":25.1,"remanded_pct":56.7},{"year":2023,"issues":563,"granted_pct":21.3,"denied_pct":19.4,"remanded_pct":57.9},{"year":2024,"issues":590,"granted_pct":22.7,"denied_pct":24.6,"remanded_pct":51.2},{"year":2025,"issues":665,"granted_pct":26.5,"denied_pct":27.4,"remanded_pct":45.1},{"year":2026,"issues":269,"granted_pct":33.1,"denied_pct":25.3,"remanded_pct":40.5}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":71,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":671,"granted_pct_with":69,"granted_pct_without":33.9},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":3655,"granted_pct_with":39.9,"granted_pct_without":47.6},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":834,"granted_pct_with":70.1,"granted_pct_without":31.9},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":2648,"granted_pct_with":35.9,"granted_pct_without":48.1},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":1460,"granted_pct_with":49.7,"granted_pct_without":37},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":215,"granted_pct_with":65.6,"granted_pct_without":40},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":3877,"granted_pct_with":40.7,"granted_pct_without":44.6},{"evidence":"buddy_statement","decisions_with":120,"granted_pct_with":54.1,"granted_pct_without":41},{"evidence":"combat_service","decisions_with":242,"granted_pct_with":49.6,"granted_pct_without":40.9}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":106},{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":50},{"reason":"service connection established","decisions":22},{"reason":"in-service noise exposure conceded","decisions":14},{"reason":"continuity of symptomatology since service","decisions":13},{"reason":"already at the maximum schedular rating","decisions":12}],"denied":[{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":180},{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":137},{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":136},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":126},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":101},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":93}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"A26040993","year":2026,"judge":"JENNIFER WHITE","rationale":"Service treatment records confirm in-service head injury.; VA examiner opined vertigo more likely than not related to in-service head injury.; Evidence in relative equipoise; doubt resolved in Veteran's favor."},{"case_id":"A26040281","year":2026,"judge":"P.M. DILORENZO","rationale":"Veteran's testimony regarding vertigo, dizziness, nausea, and staggering is credible.; Symptoms are consistent with dizziness and occasional staggering under DC 6204.; A separate 30 percent rating is warranted as the highest schedular rating."},{"case_id":"A26039967","year":2026,"judge":"ANN K. MINAMI","rationale":"Criteria for service connection met."}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26040784","year":2026,"judge":"L. STEPANICK","rationale":"Veteran already receiving maximum 30% rating; Symptoms consistent with maximum rating criteria; Evidence weighed against higher rating"},{"case_id":"A26040422","year":2026,"judge":"J.P. NORMAN","rationale":"No new and relevant evidence submitted since prior denial; No treatment records for condition found in permissible evidentiary period; Evidence weighs against the claim"},{"case_id":"A26039308","year":2026,"judge":"DAVID GRATZ","rationale":"Evidence persuasively weighs against claim for rating in excess of 10 percent.; No approximate balance of evidence, benefit-of-the-doubt rule does not apply.; VA examinations noted dizziness but not staggering."}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}