{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/peripheral-nerve-paralysis","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:33:52.817Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Peripheral nerve paralysis","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":977,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":18.7,"denied_pct":36.1,"remanded_pct":48.5,"granted_on_merits_pct":34.1,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":60,"granted_pct":11.7,"denied_pct":45,"remanded_pct":33.3},{"year":2018,"issues":124,"granted_pct":23.4,"denied_pct":46.8,"remanded_pct":28.2},{"year":2019,"issues":170,"granted_pct":14.7,"denied_pct":37.6,"remanded_pct":46.5},{"year":2020,"issues":214,"granted_pct":14.5,"denied_pct":32.2,"remanded_pct":52.3},{"year":2021,"issues":216,"granted_pct":12.5,"denied_pct":37.5,"remanded_pct":49.5},{"year":2022,"issues":229,"granted_pct":19.2,"denied_pct":24.5,"remanded_pct":53.3},{"year":2023,"issues":253,"granted_pct":15.8,"denied_pct":38.3,"remanded_pct":45.8},{"year":2024,"issues":223,"granted_pct":21.1,"denied_pct":30.5,"remanded_pct":46.6},{"year":2025,"issues":281,"granted_pct":17.8,"denied_pct":34.5,"remanded_pct":46.3},{"year":2026,"issues":90,"granted_pct":26.7,"denied_pct":25.6,"remanded_pct":46.7}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":65.6,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":144,"granted_pct_with":60.9,"granted_pct_without":26.8},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":763,"granted_pct_with":29.9,"granted_pct_without":57.1},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":149,"granted_pct_with":66.9,"granted_pct_without":24.6},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":448,"granted_pct_with":30.9,"granted_pct_without":37.2},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":278,"granted_pct_with":45.5,"granted_pct_without":28.1},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":41,"granted_pct_with":57.1,"granted_pct_without":32.9},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":757,"granted_pct_with":30,"granted_pct_without":55.1},{"evidence":"combat_service","decisions_with":65,"granted_pct_with":35.9,"granted_pct_without":34}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":29},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":23},{"reason":"service connection established","decisions":9},{"reason":"severance of service connection was improper","decisions":4},{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":2},{"reason":"conceded herbicide exposure","decisions":2}],"denied":[{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":82},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":28},{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":24},{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":23},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":17},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":16}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"A26037175","year":2026,"judge":"M. SCHLICKENMAIER","rationale":"Favorable VA examination finding; Toxic exposure risk activity in Guam; Benefit of the doubt applied"},{"case_id":"A26031333","year":2026,"judge":"TIFFANY DAWSON","rationale":"Severance of service connection was improper.; Criteria for restoration of service connection met."},{"case_id":"A26031295","year":2026,"judge":"S. BUSH","rationale":"VA proposed severance based on June 2019 examiner finding insufficient objective evidence.; January 2019 examiner found radiculopathy based on decreased sensation to light touch.; Board found reasonable minds could differ on CUE, thus VA did not meet burden to sever."}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26040914","year":2026,"judge":"JONATHAN HAGER","rationale":"No current diagnosis of left lower extremity radiculopathy.; No symptoms causing impairment in earning capacity related to left lower extremity radiculopathy.; VA examinations and treatment records did not support the claim."},{"case_id":"A26030895","year":2026,"judge":"M. M. CELLI","rationale":"No current diagnosis of nerve disorder; VA examiner found reported symptoms non-physiological; VA examiner opined less likely than not related to service-connected knee disability"},{"case_id":"A26029706","year":2026,"judge":"E. I. VELEZ","rationale":"No current disability established; Service treatment records negative for complaints or treatment; No persistent symptoms impairing earning capacity"}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}