{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/non-hodgkins-lymphoma","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:34:20.819Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Non-hodgkin's lymphoma","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":1088,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":30.3,"denied_pct":26.9,"remanded_pct":41.5,"granted_on_merits_pct":53,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":57,"granted_pct":35.1,"denied_pct":28.1,"remanded_pct":35.1},{"year":2018,"issues":108,"granted_pct":28.7,"denied_pct":38.9,"remanded_pct":31.5},{"year":2019,"issues":146,"granted_pct":24,"denied_pct":34.9,"remanded_pct":39},{"year":2020,"issues":126,"granted_pct":23,"denied_pct":32.5,"remanded_pct":42.9},{"year":2021,"issues":121,"granted_pct":24.8,"denied_pct":14.9,"remanded_pct":57.9},{"year":2022,"issues":140,"granted_pct":33.6,"denied_pct":23.6,"remanded_pct":40.7},{"year":2023,"issues":143,"granted_pct":31.5,"denied_pct":25.2,"remanded_pct":39.2},{"year":2024,"issues":122,"granted_pct":30.3,"denied_pct":20.5,"remanded_pct":48.4},{"year":2025,"issues":95,"granted_pct":38.9,"denied_pct":24.2,"remanded_pct":35.8},{"year":2026,"issues":43,"granted_pct":44.2,"denied_pct":18.6,"remanded_pct":34.9}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":69.1,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":121,"granted_pct_with":65.2,"granted_pct_without":50.9},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":556,"granted_pct_with":40.9,"granted_pct_without":67.6},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":195,"granted_pct_with":81.9,"granted_pct_without":44.7},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":329,"granted_pct_with":38.9,"granted_pct_without":59.8},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":389,"granted_pct_with":58.4,"granted_pct_without":49.2},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":101,"granted_pct_with":72.3,"granted_pct_without":50.7},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":801,"granted_pct_with":49.1,"granted_pct_without":67.7},{"evidence":"buddy_statement","decisions_with":57,"granted_pct_with":75.6,"granted_pct_without":51.4}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":58},{"reason":"veteran served in thailand during vietnam era","decisions":9},{"reason":"presumption of herbicide exposure applied","decisions":4},{"reason":"non-hodgkin's lymphoma is a presumptive condition under 38 c.f.r. § 3.309(e)","decisions":4},{"reason":"non-hodgkin's lymphoma is presumptively linked to herbicide exposure","decisions":4},{"reason":"non-hodgkin's lymphoma is a presumptive condition for herbicide exposure","decisions":4}],"denied":[{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":27},{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":24},{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":24},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":15},{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":13},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":8}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"26005082","year":2026,"judge":"L. M. BARNARD","rationale":"Veteran served at Fort McClellan during periods of herbicide use/storage.; Board found evidence in equipoise regarding herbicide exposure.; Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is a presumptive condition for herbicide exposure."},{"case_id":"A26040092","year":2026,"judge":"MICHAEL MARTIN","rationale":"Fort McClellan exposure conceded; Evidence at least approximately balanced; Resolving doubt in favor of veteran"},{"case_id":"A26038491","year":2026,"judge":"LUKE PELICAN","rationale":"Favorable AOJ findings for diagnosis and TERA exposure; Benefit of the doubt applied; Private opinion more probative than VA opinion"}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26038503","year":2026,"judge":"L. STEPANICK","rationale":"Confirmed diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.; Veteran participated in TERA (diesel exhaust, fuels, VOCs, etc.).; VA examiner found no evidence linking NHL to TERA exposures."},{"case_id":"A26037887","year":2026,"judge":"J. KIRBY","rationale":"No nexus opinion linking diagnosis to service.; Diagnosis made after AOJ decision; no pre-decisional duty to assist error.; Attorney's contention regarding condition classification not medically supported."},{"case_id":"A26033613","year":2026,"judge":"S.C. KREMBS","rationale":"NHL diagnosis was erroneous.; Severance of service connection for NHL was proper.; Veteran does not have NHL."}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}