{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/hip-impairment","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:34:00.637Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Hip impairment","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":23291,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":15.8,"denied_pct":30.6,"remanded_pct":55.4,"granted_on_merits_pct":34.1,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":1642,"granted_pct":8,"denied_pct":34.2,"remanded_pct":54.8},{"year":2018,"issues":2856,"granted_pct":9.8,"denied_pct":31.3,"remanded_pct":56.7},{"year":2019,"issues":3471,"granted_pct":10.3,"denied_pct":30.6,"remanded_pct":57.3},{"year":2020,"issues":3692,"granted_pct":10.9,"denied_pct":34.6,"remanded_pct":53.5},{"year":2021,"issues":3916,"granted_pct":12.4,"denied_pct":33.1,"remanded_pct":53.3},{"year":2022,"issues":3911,"granted_pct":14,"denied_pct":26.8,"remanded_pct":58.3},{"year":2023,"issues":4526,"granted_pct":13.8,"denied_pct":26.7,"remanded_pct":58.4},{"year":2024,"issues":4883,"granted_pct":17,"denied_pct":29,"remanded_pct":53.3},{"year":2025,"issues":5170,"granted_pct":19.4,"denied_pct":33.2,"remanded_pct":46.5},{"year":2026,"issues":1882,"granted_pct":26.2,"denied_pct":28.2,"remanded_pct":44.7}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":70.8,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":2221,"granted_pct_with":59.4,"granted_pct_without":29.7},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":17540,"granted_pct_with":33.3,"granted_pct_without":37.3},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":3525,"granted_pct_with":72.5,"granted_pct_without":22.7},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":12164,"granted_pct_with":34.5,"granted_pct_without":33.5},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":6805,"granted_pct_with":48.9,"granted_pct_without":25.7},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":1144,"granted_pct_with":58.8,"granted_pct_without":32.4},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":18918,"granted_pct_with":33,"granted_pct_without":39.7},{"evidence":"buddy_statement","decisions_with":627,"granted_pct_with":46.3,"granted_pct_without":33.7},{"evidence":"combat_service","decisions_with":1073,"granted_pct_with":46.5,"granted_pct_without":33.4}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":449},{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":280},{"reason":"service connection established","decisions":143},{"reason":"continuity of symptomatology since service","decisions":68},{"reason":"aggravated by the service-connected disability","decisions":56},{"reason":"criteria for service connection met","decisions":45}],"denied":[{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":872},{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":743},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":691},{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":641},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":532},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":317}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"26005105","year":2026,"judge":"T. RAYMOND","rationale":"Credible lay reports of persistent symptoms since MVA; MVA caused physical injuries; Established pattern of other service-connected musculoskeletal disabilities from same MVA; Imaging confirmed degenerative changes; No other post-service cause identified; Benefit of the doubt applied"},{"case_id":"A26040788","year":2026,"judge":"REBECCA N. POULSON","rationale":"Board found evidence in equipoise; VA opinions inadequate; Private surgeon opinion found most probative"},{"case_id":"A26040917","year":2026,"judge":"YVETTE R. WHITE","rationale":"Private medical opinion provided favorable nexus; Equipoise resolved in Veteran's favor; Secondary to service-connected lumbar spine disability"}],"denied":[{"case_id":"26005086","year":2026,"judge":"A. C. MACKENZIE","rationale":"Disability not shown as chronic in service; Did not manifest to a compensable degree within presumptive period; No continuity of symptomatology attributable to service; No medical nexus established between current disorder and service; No radiographic evidence of retained needle fragment; Osteoarthr… [truncated, 45 chars omitted]"},{"case_id":"26005099","year":2026,"judge":"PAULETTE VANCE BURTON","rationale":"Residuals did not meet criteria for higher rating; Pain levels (2/10-3/10) not considered severe; Range of motion not significantly limited"},{"case_id":"A26040479","year":2026,"judge":"MICHELLE L. KANE","rationale":"No competent evidence of current disability; Service records negative for follow-up treatment; Veteran reported no current treatment for joint pain; Failed to attend rescheduled VA examinations"}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}