{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/erectile-dysfunction","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:29:06.755Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Erectile dysfunction","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":17513,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":17,"denied_pct":29.9,"remanded_pct":50.8,"granted_on_merits_pct":36.3,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":1075,"granted_pct":10.1,"denied_pct":35.6,"remanded_pct":50.1},{"year":2018,"issues":1904,"granted_pct":12.9,"denied_pct":32.1,"remanded_pct":51.3},{"year":2019,"issues":2068,"granted_pct":12.4,"denied_pct":32.6,"remanded_pct":52.5},{"year":2020,"issues":2017,"granted_pct":14,"denied_pct":29.9,"remanded_pct":54.2},{"year":2021,"issues":1677,"granted_pct":16.6,"denied_pct":27.5,"remanded_pct":52.7},{"year":2022,"issues":1763,"granted_pct":18.8,"denied_pct":24.8,"remanded_pct":54.4},{"year":2023,"issues":1868,"granted_pct":16.9,"denied_pct":27,"remanded_pct":53.3},{"year":2024,"issues":2094,"granted_pct":21.3,"denied_pct":27,"remanded_pct":50.1},{"year":2025,"issues":2344,"granted_pct":22.4,"denied_pct":32.2,"remanded_pct":43.7},{"year":2026,"issues":817,"granted_pct":24.7,"denied_pct":30.7,"remanded_pct":42.1}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":73.1,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":2404,"granted_pct_with":67.7,"granted_pct_without":29.2},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":12659,"granted_pct_with":34,"granted_pct_without":44.5},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":3386,"granted_pct_with":73.8,"granted_pct_without":23.1},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":9017,"granted_pct_with":39.4,"granted_pct_without":32.9},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":5350,"granted_pct_with":50,"granted_pct_without":28.9},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":936,"granted_pct_with":59,"granted_pct_without":34.7},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":13024,"granted_pct_with":34,"granted_pct_without":44.2},{"evidence":"buddy_statement","decisions_with":464,"granted_pct_with":56.3,"granted_pct_without":35.8},{"evidence":"combat_service","decisions_with":1219,"granted_pct_with":46.1,"granted_pct_without":35.6}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":509},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":463},{"reason":"service connection established","decisions":268},{"reason":"aggravated by the service-connected disability","decisions":50},{"reason":"criteria for service connection met","decisions":43},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":31}],"denied":[{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":500},{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":420},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":345},{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":302},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":281},{"reason":"no evidence of penile deformity","decisions":222}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"A26040559","year":2026,"judge":"D. JOHNSON","rationale":"Evidence in approximate balance regarding secondary connection to major depressive disorder.; VA examiner found erectile dysfunction less likely than not due to major depressive disorder, but noted it could be a cause.; Private physician opined psychiatric disorder was at least as likely as not the … [truncated, 113 chars omitted]"},{"case_id":"A26040684","year":2026,"judge":"MICHAEL J. SKALTSOUNIS","rationale":"Veteran has a current diagnosis of ED.; Veteran is service-connected for DM II.; A private medical opinion found ED to be at least as likely as not due to DM II.; Benefit of the doubt applied to grant secondary service connection."},{"case_id":"A26040749","year":2026,"judge":"STEVEN D. REISS","rationale":"Negative service treatment records.; Unfavorable VA opinion.; Approximate balance of evidence weighs in Veteran's favor.; Onset reported in service, diagnosis shortly after separation."}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26040774","year":2026,"judge":"PAUL SORISIO","rationale":"Criteria for compensable rating not met; Evidence weighs against penile deformity manifestation"},{"case_id":"A26040428","year":2026,"judge":"YVETTE R. WHITE","rationale":"FSAD is rated noncompensable; Veteran receives SMC for loss of use of creative organ"},{"case_id":"A26040157","year":2026,"judge":"J. T. HUTCHESON","rationale":"Veteran reported occasional difficulty obtaining and maintaining an erection.; No penile deformity noted on examination.; Erectile dysfunction warrants only a noncompensable rating."}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}