{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/dermatophytosis","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:33:58.375Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Dermatophytosis","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":730,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":19.7,"denied_pct":66.3,"remanded_pct":16,"granted_on_merits_pct":22.9,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":56,"granted_pct":10.7,"denied_pct":60.7,"remanded_pct":17.9},{"year":2018,"issues":52,"granted_pct":17.3,"denied_pct":61.5,"remanded_pct":17.3},{"year":2019,"issues":54,"granted_pct":14.8,"denied_pct":63,"remanded_pct":22.2},{"year":2020,"issues":88,"granted_pct":18.2,"denied_pct":59.1,"remanded_pct":22.7},{"year":2021,"issues":101,"granted_pct":20.8,"denied_pct":62.4,"remanded_pct":13.9},{"year":2022,"issues":72,"granted_pct":20.8,"denied_pct":48.6,"remanded_pct":27.8},{"year":2023,"issues":86,"granted_pct":24.4,"denied_pct":57,"remanded_pct":16.3},{"year":2024,"issues":117,"granted_pct":22.2,"denied_pct":68.4,"remanded_pct":8.5},{"year":2025,"issues":131,"granted_pct":16,"denied_pct":74.8,"remanded_pct":8.4},{"year":2026,"issues":43,"granted_pct":16.3,"denied_pct":67.4,"remanded_pct":11.6}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":61.8,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":121,"granted_pct_with":44.4,"granted_pct_without":18},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":646,"granted_pct_with":20.8,"granted_pct_without":47.1},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":84,"granted_pct_with":34.2,"granted_pct_without":21.4},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":301,"granted_pct_with":22.8,"granted_pct_without":23},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":206,"granted_pct_with":24.6,"granted_pct_without":22.2},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":636,"granted_pct_with":23.6,"granted_pct_without":17.8},{"evidence":"combat_service","decisions_with":43,"granted_pct_with":40,"granted_pct_without":22.1}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":7},{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":4},{"reason":"continuity of symptomatology since service","decisions":3},{"reason":"service connection established","decisions":3},{"reason":"rated by analogy under dc 7804 (painful scars)","decisions":2},{"reason":"criteria for 10 percent rating met","decisions":2}],"denied":[{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":39},{"reason":"no systemic therapy required","decisions":28},{"reason":"did not meet criteria for compensable rating","decisions":20},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":14},{"reason":"did not require systemic therapy","decisions":12},{"reason":"condition affects less than 5% of body/exposed areas","decisions":10}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"26005031","year":2026,"judge":"L. STEPANICK","rationale":"Constant or near-constant use of topical hydrocortisone cream; Veteran's testimony regarding cream use was credible; Reasonable doubt resolved in veteran's favor"},{"case_id":"A26026197","year":2026,"judge":"B.T. KNOPE","rationale":"Veteran's testimony regarding affected areas found credible; Condition affected 5-20% of exposed areas; Higher rating denied due to lack of characteristic lesions or systemic therapy"},{"case_id":"A26022483","year":2026,"judge":"FREDERIC P. GALLUN","rationale":"VA foot examination diagnosed tinea pedis; Service treatment records show foot issues; Veteran's testimony competent regarding onset/persistence; Benefit of the doubt resolved in veteran's favor"}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26035975","year":2026,"judge":"M. M. CELLI","rationale":"Condition affected less than 20 percent of the entire body; Condition did not require systemic therapy; No evidence of characteristic lesions involving 20-40% of body/exposed areas"},{"case_id":"A26035050","year":2026,"judge":"JOHN Z. JONES","rationale":"Failure to attend scheduled VA examination without good cause; New examination necessary to establish current diagnosis; No evidence of record for current tinea pedis"},{"case_id":"A26033105","year":2026,"judge":"MICHELLE L. KANE","rationale":"Condition affected less than 5% of body area.; Condition affected no exposed areas.; Only topical therapy was required."}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}