{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/dermatitis-or-eczema","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:34:07.440Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Dermatitis or eczema","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":12697,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":16.9,"denied_pct":35.6,"remanded_pct":46.6,"granted_on_merits_pct":32.2,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":1143,"granted_pct":10.2,"denied_pct":41.9,"remanded_pct":38.2},{"year":2018,"issues":1526,"granted_pct":13.8,"denied_pct":39.1,"remanded_pct":42.9},{"year":2019,"issues":1567,"granted_pct":12.8,"denied_pct":34.3,"remanded_pct":49.9},{"year":2020,"issues":1648,"granted_pct":13.2,"denied_pct":37.1,"remanded_pct":48.2},{"year":2021,"issues":1557,"granted_pct":14.7,"denied_pct":35.5,"remanded_pct":48.2},{"year":2022,"issues":1422,"granted_pct":17.9,"denied_pct":27.5,"remanded_pct":53},{"year":2023,"issues":1512,"granted_pct":18.2,"denied_pct":26.9,"remanded_pct":52.7},{"year":2024,"issues":1326,"granted_pct":20.4,"denied_pct":32.3,"remanded_pct":45.7},{"year":2025,"issues":1337,"granted_pct":23.6,"denied_pct":39.3,"remanded_pct":35.9},{"year":2026,"issues":484,"granted_pct":26,"denied_pct":40.3,"remanded_pct":31.6}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":71.6,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":1516,"granted_pct_with":56.5,"granted_pct_without":27.3},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":9541,"granted_pct_with":30.3,"granted_pct_without":42.5},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":1448,"granted_pct_with":62.1,"granted_pct_without":27},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":5900,"granted_pct_with":30.5,"granted_pct_without":33.9},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":3154,"granted_pct_with":41.4,"granted_pct_without":28.7},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":569,"granted_pct_with":53.2,"granted_pct_without":31},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":10597,"granted_pct_with":32,"granted_pct_without":33.6},{"evidence":"buddy_statement","decisions_with":328,"granted_pct_with":46.6,"granted_pct_without":31.8},{"evidence":"combat_service","decisions_with":916,"granted_pct_with":36.2,"granted_pct_without":31.9}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":258},{"reason":"criteria for service connection met","decisions":26},{"reason":"already at the maximum schedular rating","decisions":25},{"reason":"service connection established","decisions":22},{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":18},{"reason":"continuity of symptomatology since service","decisions":16}],"denied":[{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":464},{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":353},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":319},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":273},{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":241},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":151}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"A26040565","year":2026,"judge":"J. B. FREEMAN","rationale":"Improper CUE finding for reduction; Ambiguity in DC 7806 regulation; Examiner's opinion on systemic therapy"},{"case_id":"A26040374","year":2026,"judge":"H.M. WALKER","rationale":"Reduction from 30% to 0% found improper; Lay evidence and private DBQ indicated continued symptoms and worsening; Contradicted VA examiner's finding of quiescent disease"},{"case_id":"26005023","year":2026,"judge":"ROBERT C. SCHARNBERGER","rationale":"Veteran's STRs silent for skin condition, but telegram mentioned leg wound.; Post-service records show intermittent rash complaints with various diagnoses (eczema, dermatitis, tinea).; Multiple VA opinions found inadequate for failing to address in-service symptoms or all diagnosed conditions.; Vete… [truncated, 144 chars omitted]"}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26040791","year":2026,"judge":"ARDIE A. BLAND","rationale":"No evidence of in-service manifestation or result; No manifestation within one year of separation"},{"case_id":"A26040113","year":2026,"judge":"S.C. KREMBS","rationale":"October 2024 VA examination noted lesions involving less than 5% of body and 0% of exposed areas.; Treatment was exclusively topical, without systemic therapy.; Examiner's opinion is competent and credible, with no contrary evidence."},{"case_id":"A26040080","year":2026,"judge":"G. A. WASIK","rationale":"PFB did not manifest with scarring or disfigurement.; PFB did not cover at least 5% of exposed areas.; PFB did not require treatment within the past 12 months."}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}