{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/brain-hemorrhage","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:33:56.822Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Brain hemorrhage","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":1545,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":15.3,"denied_pct":28.2,"remanded_pct":55,"granted_on_merits_pct":35.3,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":93,"granted_pct":8.6,"denied_pct":37.6,"remanded_pct":50.5},{"year":2018,"issues":199,"granted_pct":12.1,"denied_pct":38.2,"remanded_pct":46.7},{"year":2019,"issues":245,"granted_pct":9.8,"denied_pct":33.1,"remanded_pct":55.9},{"year":2020,"issues":190,"granted_pct":9.5,"denied_pct":31.1,"remanded_pct":59.5},{"year":2021,"issues":185,"granted_pct":15.7,"denied_pct":28.1,"remanded_pct":53},{"year":2022,"issues":171,"granted_pct":14.6,"denied_pct":17,"remanded_pct":67.3},{"year":2023,"issues":182,"granted_pct":20.9,"denied_pct":27.5,"remanded_pct":50},{"year":2024,"issues":129,"granted_pct":22.5,"denied_pct":14,"remanded_pct":62},{"year":2025,"issues":115,"granted_pct":25.2,"denied_pct":20,"remanded_pct":53.9},{"year":2026,"issues":62,"granted_pct":25.8,"denied_pct":25.8,"remanded_pct":46.8}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":76.8,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":181,"granted_pct_with":68.7,"granted_pct_without":27.2},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":1003,"granted_pct_with":34.9,"granted_pct_without":36.1},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":298,"granted_pct_with":77.5,"granted_pct_without":14.4},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":802,"granted_pct_with":36,"granted_pct_without":34.3},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":518,"granted_pct_with":52.8,"granted_pct_without":21},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":86,"granted_pct_with":60.8,"granted_pct_without":33.2},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":1048,"granted_pct_with":26.1,"granted_pct_without":63.8},{"evidence":"buddy_statement","decisions_with":45,"granted_pct_with":35,"granted_pct_without":35.3},{"evidence":"combat_service","decisions_with":78,"granted_pct_with":46.7,"granted_pct_without":34.7}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":41},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":26},{"reason":"service connection established","decisions":24},{"reason":"secondary service connection granted","decisions":4},{"reason":"criteria for service connection met","decisions":3},{"reason":"new and material evidence received to reopen claim","decisions":3}],"denied":[{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":70},{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":38},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":38},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":33},{"reason":"no continuity of symptomatology","decisions":15},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":13}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"A26039871","year":2026,"judge":"MARJORIE A. AUER","rationale":"Secondary to service-connected cardiovascular condition; Due to service-connected cardiovascular condition"},{"case_id":"A26038382","year":2026,"judge":"RAY BARTO SLABBEKORN, JR.","rationale":"Criteria met for entitlement to service connection for right MCA stroke with left-sided hemiplegia and major neurocognitive impairment, secondary to sleep apnea and hypertension.; Residuals of the Veteran's stroke were caused by his service-connected sleep apnea and hypertension.; Benefit of the dou… [truncated, 27 chars omitted]"},{"case_id":"A26036453","year":2026,"judge":"GAYLE STROMMEN","rationale":"No dispute of current residuals; Service connection for hypertension established; Positive nexus from private and VA opinions linking residuals to hypertension"}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26040549","year":2026,"judge":"MELANIE J. MANN","rationale":"No evidence of herbicide exposure; No other basis for service connection found"},{"case_id":"A26037914","year":2026,"judge":"G. A. WASIK","rationale":"Service connection for hypertension was denied.; First element of secondary service connection (current disability) met.; Second element (service-connected disability) not met.; Third element (link between service-connected disability and current disability) not met."},{"case_id":"A26036511","year":2026,"judge":"J. NICHOLS","rationale":"No in-service incurrence or relation to service; VA examiner opined less likely than not caused by PFAS/TERA; Strokes likely due to central atherosclerosis and risk factors"}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}