{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/bone-neoplasm-benign","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:33:58.668Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Bone neoplasm benign","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":1161,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":12.7,"denied_pct":36.2,"remanded_pct":50,"granted_on_merits_pct":25.9,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":219,"granted_pct":14.2,"denied_pct":34.7,"remanded_pct":45.7},{"year":2018,"issues":368,"granted_pct":11.1,"denied_pct":36.1,"remanded_pct":50},{"year":2019,"issues":195,"granted_pct":9.2,"denied_pct":33.3,"remanded_pct":52.3},{"year":2020,"issues":101,"granted_pct":10.9,"denied_pct":39.6,"remanded_pct":49.5},{"year":2021,"issues":94,"granted_pct":14.9,"denied_pct":36.2,"remanded_pct":47.9},{"year":2022,"issues":84,"granted_pct":8.3,"denied_pct":26.2,"remanded_pct":63.1},{"year":2023,"issues":80,"granted_pct":11.3,"denied_pct":25,"remanded_pct":62.5},{"year":2024,"issues":86,"granted_pct":8.1,"denied_pct":26.7,"remanded_pct":62.8},{"year":2025,"issues":77,"granted_pct":16.9,"denied_pct":35.1,"remanded_pct":44.2},{"year":2026,"issues":20,"granted_pct":25,"denied_pct":55,"remanded_pct":15}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":70.7,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":118,"granted_pct_with":44.9,"granted_pct_without":22.4},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":778,"granted_pct_with":22.1,"granted_pct_without":40.9},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":134,"granted_pct_with":52.3,"granted_pct_without":21.1},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":501,"granted_pct_with":21.1,"granted_pct_without":30.9},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":289,"granted_pct_with":34.7,"granted_pct_without":22.9},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":51,"granted_pct_with":56.7,"granted_pct_without":24.2},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":914,"granted_pct_with":25.6,"granted_pct_without":27.5},{"evidence":"combat_service","decisions_with":72,"granted_pct_with":34.1,"granted_pct_without":25.2}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":21},{"reason":"criteria for service connection met","decisions":5},{"reason":"in-service injury documented","decisions":4},{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":4},{"reason":"new and material evidence submitted","decisions":2}],"denied":[{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":63},{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":45},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":31},{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":27},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":26},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":25}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"A26034914","year":2026,"judge":"A. JAEGER","rationale":"Favorable private medical opinion; Benefit of the doubt applied; In-service injury documented"},{"case_id":"A26031702","year":2026,"judge":"T. RAYMOND","rationale":"Favorable findings from AOJ regarding current diagnosis and in-service plantar fasciitis; Conflicting opinions: VA exam found less likely than not related; private physician found highly likely caused by service; Board applied benefit of the doubt due to balanced evidence"},{"case_id":"A26016613","year":2026,"judge":"M. C. WILSON","rationale":"Presumption of soundness applies due to no noted pre-service injury.; In-service injury (groin strain) linked to current pubic bone deformity via x-ray and private medical opinion.; Doubt resolved in veteran's favor due to nearly equal evidence."}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26040791","year":2026,"judge":"ARDIE A. BLAND","rationale":"No evidence of in-service manifestation or result; No manifestation within one year of separation"},{"case_id":"A26037352","year":2026,"judge":"NATHANIEL DOAN","rationale":"Current disability met; No evidence of in-service incurrence or aggravation; No credible evidence of radiation or toxic exposure; Weight of evidence against claim"},{"case_id":"A26032636","year":2026,"judge":"ANN K. MINAMI","rationale":"No current diagnosis of bone spurs; Post-service medical records and VA exams did not confirm current diagnosis"}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}